The rule that allowed deadly force to prevent the escape of a suspected felon, even when there was no immediate threat to the public, is known as the Fleeing Felon Rule.

Prepare for the SkillsUSA Law Enforcement and Crime Scene Investigation Test. Gain confidence with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, complete with hints and explanations. Ready yourself for success!

Multiple Choice

The rule that allowed deadly force to prevent the escape of a suspected felon, even when there was no immediate threat to the public, is known as the Fleeing Felon Rule.

Explanation:
This tests knowledge of a historical rule that allowed police to use deadly force to prevent the escape of a suspected felon, even when there was no immediate threat to anyone. That doctrine is the Fleeing Felon Rule. It reflected a time when stopping an escape was considered a priority strong enough to justify lethal force regardless of the suspect’s current danger to others. In contrast, the other terms describe ways of detaining or stopping people for investigation (stop-and-frisk, Terry stop) or the threshold used to justify stops (reasonable suspicion), none of which center on using deadly force to prevent escape. Modern law narrows this idea: in Tennessee v. Garner, the Supreme Court held that deadly force against a fleeing non-threatening suspect is unconstitutional and that such force is permissible only if the suspect poses an imminent threat of death or serious physical injury.

This tests knowledge of a historical rule that allowed police to use deadly force to prevent the escape of a suspected felon, even when there was no immediate threat to anyone. That doctrine is the Fleeing Felon Rule. It reflected a time when stopping an escape was considered a priority strong enough to justify lethal force regardless of the suspect’s current danger to others. In contrast, the other terms describe ways of detaining or stopping people for investigation (stop-and-frisk, Terry stop) or the threshold used to justify stops (reasonable suspicion), none of which center on using deadly force to prevent escape. Modern law narrows this idea: in Tennessee v. Garner, the Supreme Court held that deadly force against a fleeing non-threatening suspect is unconstitutional and that such force is permissible only if the suspect poses an imminent threat of death or serious physical injury.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy